Fortifications
Building city walls was of fundamental concern to the imperial
administration, as is evident from Justinian’s plan to build walls around many
cities and fortify areas of major strategic significance.
Together with the political and economic decline that
gradually set in from the late 4th century, natural disasters and epidemics
led to significant changes in the form of cities.
Some were abandoned and
others shrunk in size and population, while new cities were established at virtually
inaccessible sites, their main aim being to provide security to inhabitants. The
fundamental objective of fortifications was to ward off attacks by creating
barriers, which were set up one after the other so as to guarantee defence. The
number and height of walls, the shape and form of towers, the number of gates
and their guard systems were all determined by the lie of the land,
developments in warfare and prevailing economic and building potential.
As a rule, walls consisted of towers with two or more
levels, from which the defenders would attack the enemy, and of high curtain walls
thick enough to withstand attacks. Cities on the plains had another lower outer
wall punctuated by towers, in front of which was a moat that could be flooded
to check the enemy. At the highest point of the settlement lay the acropolis or
citadel. With its own wall for defensive autonomy, this was the last refuge for
defenders, and housed the seat of church authority and military command. From
as early as Justinian times, an intermediary wall divided the city in two, thus
providing a further line of defence. The gates opened at sunrise and closed at
sunset. They were few in number, since they were established at the most
vulnerable points in the fortifications.
As an outstanding set of defences, the walls of Constantinople
set the standard for fortifications around Byzantine cities. Indicative of
their quality is the fact that the walls withstood siege by the Ottomans for
over a thousand years.
Lastly, fortresses and towers were fortifications
which, like city-castles, adopted the rationale of successive lines of defence.
Their aim was to control strategic positions and passes and defend wider geographical
areas. In addition, they provided storage for agricultural produce,
accommodation for local rulers and shelter for the population in times of
danger.
Bibliography (6)▼
Comments (0)▼
New Comment▼