Warfare


During the period of Byzantine Empire, various nations wanted to occupy its territories. Trying to organize the defence, the Byzantine cities were the basis of the political, military and ecclesiastical administration and for that reason, their fortification was a major goal of the imperial administration.
 
According to the work of Procopius “Peri Ktismatwn” About buildings, Justinian trying to strengthen the defence of the state, he granted money in order to rebuild the walls of many under ordinate towns, and in order to create or strengthen with fortifications the strategic places of special importance. At the same time, he organized a network of new fortified cities in vital places in order to ensure the protection of the streets and the trade routes.  The fortification practice was not unknown in the ancient world, however in the Byzantine era, it was developed a lot, with many and impressive examples in the whole empire. Fortified cities, citadels, castles, towers, intermediate walls, were created for the defense of the state and ensured the protection the residents.

Although the emperor and the supreme dignitaries emphasized mainly on the diplomacy for the confrontation of the hostile disposals of the neighbors, the organization of the army and navy became an urgent requirement. The organization of the army was based on two corps: limitanei and comitanses. Limitanei were farmers lived in the borders, to which the state granted cultivable ground with the obligation to offer military services. Comitanses were the regular army, under the leadership of the the emperor, who could be transported wherever it was required. Other corps were the allies, the bucellarii and the confederates, that consisted of foreigner condotieres.

However, the Byzantine army, despite the well organization, it could not be a ready for war and effective as a mass, capable of ensuring the integrity of the territories of the Byzantine empire and the safety of the residents, if they were not equipped with the right  military equipment (armor and helmet) and arms. The polemic arms are distinguished between those of fighting hand to hand (sword, lance, club, axe, arcs and arrows) that were used for fighting body to body, and of ballistic arms that struck the enemy from distance. Of this last type were the wall fighting arms, meaning all those which were used during the sieges of castles, such as the battering ram, the pelting, and the tortoise (chelone).  Apart from the army of land, the navy was particularly organized too in Byzantium, as an organic department of the administration of themata (provinces).So, the fleet of the provinces was created, the thematic ploima (watercrafts of provinces), with head generals or drungaries. The Royal water craft was an independent fleet for the defense of the capital with head the drungarios, that had the role of the general admiral.

The Byzantine navy allocated dromons, dromonia and chelandia that were boats equipped, on one hand, with wooden castles “xylokastra”, from where the warriors could throw missiles against the hostile boats, and on the other hand, with throwing machines for “sifones”, the earthen or metal containers that contained the Greek fire. Greek fire was the most perfected version of between now and then known incendiary materials on martial purposes. The main success of it, at the naval battles, was that it caused the confusion and the panic in any hostile fleet, which was forced to leave because of the fire and the bad effect on the moral of the crew of the wooden ships.
 


Glossary (1)

drungarios: military rank in the Byzantine army and fleet, equivalent to the chiliarch (commander of a thousand). From the 12th century onwards drungarioi also had judicial duties, judging civil cases.


Information Texts (3)

Procopius: Prolific Byzantine historian. Born in Caesarea ​​Palestinae, he studied rhetoric, sophistry and law. He moved to Constantinople at an early age, where he practiced as an orator and lawyer. He soon entered the circle of General Belisarius as secretary and advisor, and followed him on many campaigns. Procopius survived the great plague of Constantinople (541-542), which he described in detail. His writings are considered the most important source for the Justinian period, although admittedly he is not impartial towards the emperor; from a certain point onwards he seems to be unfavourably biased against both Justinian and Theodora. From 549 onwards Procopius lived permanently in Constantinople, though no information has survived on the final years of his life.
Justinian I: Byzantine Emperor (527-565), nephew and successor of Justin I. One of his first acts was to reform the tax system and recode Theodosius’ laws. He was personally involved in religious conflicts and convened the 5th Ecumenical Council (553). Justinian considered himself primarily an orthodox emperor and took harsh measures against the remaining pagans. Many of his political and fiscal actions provoked strong reactions on the part of the senate and the factions and led to the Nika Riots. Justinian instigated numerous building projects, erecting approximately 30 churches in Constantinople, including the famous church of Agia Sophia. Regarding foreign policy, he successfully confronted the Persians and the Vandals in the East and focused on the recovery of the West. This he temporarily achieved, but at such cost that the Empire was left exhausted; the barbarians in the Balkans plundered the Greek peninsula as far as the Isthmus and barbarian tribes settled at the borders. His military operations exhausted Byzantium financially and militarily and had no real effect, as Italy and other areas he conquered were soon lost again. After his death, the weakened empire had to face new attacks, culminating in the Arab conquests, which negated the majority of Justinian’s conquests beyond the borders.
Themata: Military units and divisions of territory. The themata were instituted in the 7th century as a countermeasure against enemy invasions. By the end of the same century most of the empire was subdivided in this way. Themata were headed by a general who exercised military, political and judicial power. Many such generals rapidly acquired considerable influence and centralized power, so by the 8th-9th century the themata were subdivided into smaller units to curb their influence. In the 11th century the generals were replaced by civilian rulers, and by the late 12th century the themata had ceased to exist.


Bibliography (0)


Comments (0)